Professors get creative to stop students using artificial intelligence to cheat

  • Some professors say students are using new technology to pass off AI-generated content as their own.
  • Academics are concerned that colleges are not set up to combat the new style of cheating.
  • Professors say they are considering returning to written assessment and oral exams.

College professors are feeling the heat when it comes to AI.

Some professors say students are using OpenAI’s lively chatbot, ChatGPT, to pass off AI-generated content as their own.

Antony Aumann, a philosophy professor at Northern Michigan University, and Darren Hick, a philosophy professor at Furman University, both say they’ve had students submit essays written by ChatGPT.

The issue has led professors to consider creative ways to eradicate the use of AI in colleges.

Blue books and oral exam

“I’m confused about how to deal with AI going forward,” Aumann told Insider.

He said one way he considered tackling the problem was to switch to browser locks, a type of software aimed at preventing students from cheating when taking exams online or remotely.

Other academics consider more drastic measures.

“I plan to go medieval on the students and go all the way back to oral exams,” said Christopher Bartel, a philosophy professor at Appalachian State University. “They can AI generate text all day in their notes if they want, but if they have to be able to speak it, that’s another thing.”

However, Bartel said there were concerns about this. “Students who have deep social anxiety about public speaking is something we need to figure out.”

“Another way to deal with AI is for faculty to avoid giving students assignments that are very well covered,” he said. “If students need to be able to engage with a unique idea that hasn’t been covered very deeply elsewhere, there’s not going to be a lot of text that the AI ​​generator can pull from.”

Aumann said some professors suggested returning to traditional written assessments such as blue books.

“Since students would be writing their essays in class by hand, there would not be an opportunity for them to cheat by consulting the chatbot,” he said.

“The genie is out of the bottle”

Although there were red flags in the AI-generated essays that alerted both Aumann and Hick to the use of ChatGPT, Aumann believes that these are only temporary.

He said the chatbot’s essays lacked individual personality, but after playing around with it, he was able to make it write less formally. “I think some of the red flags we have are only temporary as far as the students can get around,” he said.

“My concern is that the genie is out of the bottle,” said Hick, who believed the technology was going to improve. “It’s kind of inevitable,” he said.

Bartel agreed that students could get away with using AI very easily. “If they tell the program to write one paragraph summarizing one idea, then one paragraph summarizing another idea, and edit them together, it would be completely impossible for me to track, and it might even be a decent essay, ” he said.

A representative for OpenAI told Insider that they did not want ChatGPT to be used for deceptive purposes.

“Our policies require users to be upfront with the public when using the API and creative tools like DALL-E and GPT-3,” the representative said. “We are already developing mitigations to help anyone identify text generated by that system.”

Although there are AI detection programs that offer an analysis of how likely the text was written by an AI program, some academics are concerned that this will not be enough to prove a case of AI plagiarism.

“We’ll need something to explain the fact that we now have an imperfect way of testing whether something is fake or not,” Bartel said. “I don’t know what the new policy is.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *